Justice manuel pamaran biography template

Upon arraignment, all accused, including the private respondents who were high-ranking military officers and enlisted personnel, pleaded not guilty. During the trial, their testimonies before the Agrava Board were offered as evidence against them by the prosecution, which the accused objected to on the grounds of self-incrimination and the immunity provision in P.

This resolution was challenged before the Supreme Court.

Justice manuel pamaran biography template: At the start of its operation

Issues: 1. Whether the testimonies given and evidence produced by private respondents before the Agrava Board, without invoking their right against self-incrimination, are admissible in evidence against them in the criminal cases for the assassination of Benigno Aquino Jr. The interpretation of the immunity provision in P. It reasoned that the compelled testimonies and production of evidence were given under the presumption of immunity as provided by P.

Because the private respondents were compelled to testify or produce evidence, their failure to invoke the privilege against self-incrimination before the Agrava Board does not deprive them of the immunity from the use of such testimonies and evidence against them in subsequent prosecutions. Pursuant to Department Order No. In the same Order, Secretary Lorenzana terminated the hold-over capacity of retired Col.

Bonifacio G. To ensure unhampered operation of the VFP and smooth leadership transition, Secretary Lorenzana also ordered the continuation in hold-over capacity of the incumbent members of the VFP Supreme Council. All VFP personnel and its financial and property management offices have also been ordered to follow and cooperate with Justice Pamaran, who was directed to secure and protect the property and financial records of the public corporation in preparation of the extensive audit by the DND and the Commission on Audit.

Roll Number 4.

Justice manuel pamaran biography template: Emmanuel de Ocampo passed

Verification Sec. Certification against Forum Shopping Sec. That before the filing of the action in court, the grievance was brought by the plaintiff before the barangay court for conciliation ii. That no settlement was reached by the parties therein; and iii. That, as proof of the foregoing averments, the plaintiff is appending the certification of Lupron Chairman concerned.

CHAPTER X: Depositions and Discovery Modes of Discovery Discovery — the disclosure by a party litigant of facts, deeds, documents or other things which are in his exclusive knowledge, control or possession and which are necessary to the party seeking discovery as a part of a cause of action pending or as evidence of his title or rights in such proceedings.

Modes: A. Oral Examination a. General Rule: A deposition is not generally supposed to be a substitute for the actual testimony in open court of a party or witness.